Bush, Gorbachev, Shultz & Soviet Education
George W. Bush,
Mikhail Gorbachev, George Shultz and your children -- how are they linked? Why does it matter?
And who is George
Shultz? How did he help rewrite history, redefine morality, and
prepare America to accept the new socialist values that are paving
the way to the new world order?
If you are as concerned as I am about America's shift from
traditional values and factual education to global values and
psycho-social strategies for "lifelong learning," you
would want to know the answers. You might also wonder why Texas
Governor George W. Bush would choose George Shultz, who negotiated
the 1985 U.S.-USSR Education Exchange
Agreement, as advisor on his presidential exploratory committee.
Or why Robert Dole chose Shultz as an advisor during his
quest for the presidency in 1996.
SEPARATENESS VS. SOLIDARITY & COMMUNITY
These alliances reflect the new perspective that motivates
our globalist leaders to set aside the old rules of involvement
and chart a new course for the world. From their point of view,
the old-fashioned national sovereignty (or independence) is out,
and global solidarity (or interdependence) is in. Now it's up to the media
and our educational "change agents" to persuade the
masses to accept their view of the earth as a global village.
The old rules don't fit in the new world order. "Nations
that stick to stale old notions and ideologies will falter and
fail," said former President Bush in 1991, when introducing the
Republican version of our international education system.[2]
Al Gore would surely agree. At a 1991Communitarian
conference in Washington, he said, "Seeing ourselves as
separate is the central problem in our political thinking." [3]
Gore's conclusion was quoted in the book, Spiritual Politics,
co-authored by Corinne McLaughlin, the first task force coordinator
for the President's Council on Sustainable Development. McLaughlin,
who likes to quote Djwhal Khul, spirit guide to theosophist Alice
Bailey, also taught her mediation strategies at the Department
of Education, Pentagon, and the EPA.
[4]
"There really is only one sin--separateness," she
states in her book. "...war is more likely to spring from rampant
nationalism, ethnocentrism, and intolerant religious fundamentalism -- all
extreme and separative attitudes.... [A} primary cause of the earth's
suffering is that humanity is caught in the illusion of
separation.... What is needed as a cure
for separateness is a deep sense of community -- that we're
all in this together."[5]
SHULTZ AND GORBACHEV
Mikhail Gorbachev shares his contempt for nationalism and
religious fundamentalism, i.e. biblical Christianity. The goal
of this unrepentant Communist continues to be a socialist world
government with power to manage and monitor every human resource
according to the will of an elite "Council of the Wise."
Back in 1995, George Shultz served as Chairman of the Board
of Advisors of the Gorbachev Foundation, which had been "created
to assist in the process of building global consensus for our
common future." The same year, he co-chaired Gorbachev's
first annual State of the World Forum in San Francisco together
with Ted Turner, Maurice Strong,[6] and
other international leaders "chosen for their internationally
recognized contributions to designing our emerging global civilization."
Among the speakers was author Sam Keen, who announced that --
"The ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis.
Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left
to do a great deal of ecological damage."[7]
Attending the Forum as a member of the press, I heard the
thundering applause that followed Keen's statement. Whether Shultz
agreed with audience or not, this popular suggestion shows the
Forum's general attitude toward human lives. Despite the noble
rhetoric about saving the oppressed, the overriding sentiment
indicated that people count only if they conform to the new ideology
and serve the world community. Therefore the masses must be trained,
managed, and monitored -- and the loss of lives due to politically
expedient conflicts matters little. The major players in this
transforming process are the media, the international education
system, and a global surveillance system. All are nearly in place
[8]-- thanks to Shultz, Clinton and others
who share their vision for managed conformity and strive to fulfill
it.
SOVIET INDOCTRINATION IN AMERICA
Shultz's friendship with Gorbachev dates back to his years
as Secretary of State in the Reagan administration
[9]
-- a time when many of us simply trusted the Republican cabinet
to represent American families. In the early eighties, few of
us realized that Shultz and David Hamburg, President of the globalist
Carnegie Corporation, were using their authority to negotiate
a binding international agreement with Soviet Foreign Minister
Eduard Shevardnadze.[10] Its terms required
that we trade our sophisticated education and data tracking technology for the brainwashing strategies
used to indoctrinate Soviet children, modify behavior, and monitor
the masses to ensure compliance with Soviet ideology.
[11]
To see what George Shultz did to undermine our American education
system, rewrite history, change values, and prepare America to
accept a new role in the "international community,"
ponder the following quotes from The Keys of This Blood
by Malachi Martin:
"Within scant months of Gorbachev's election in March
of 1985 to the post of General Secretary of the Central Committee
of the CPSU, he and President Reagan met at their first summit
in Geneva. . . November 19-20,1985.... [They signed] the
General Agreement on Contacts, Exchanges and Scientific Technical
Education and Other Fields... It authorized mutual exchange
programs, the homogenization of curricula, the sharing of facilities
and the mutual indoctrination of the two peoples involved. .
. .
"Cooperation would cover all computer-based instruction,
instructional hardware and curriculum design for all grades of
primary and secondary education, as well as college and university
studies. The obvious goal was a total homogenization not only
of the methods of teaching and learning, but what was to be taught.
. . .
"Cooperation, for instance, in the 'social sciences'
turned a blind eye to the official prostitution of psychiatry
and psychology by the Soviet Union as clinical tools for inflicting
mental and physical torture as political punishment and for disposing
of dissidents. The USSR had been banned from the World Psychiatric
Association in 1983 for such practices. ...
"Or take cooperation in the humanities. As taught in
the Soviet Union, all humanities are marinated in Leninist Marxism
as a matter of course. And history is distorted by a thoroughgoing
Marxisation of ideas, by the systematic suppression of facts,
and by downright lies. One might wonder what common curricula
might be drawn up between the USSR and the US. . . . "
". . .the aim of the General Agreement -- at least from
the point of view of the Wise Men of the West -- was 'to transform
the shape of the world'. . . because 'sooner or later we are
going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that
they are not confined merely to the nation-states. . . . '"
"That agreement came from already established drawing
boards. . . . For both parties intend to create nothing less
than a new arrangement in all human affairs -- 'a new world order,'
to use a consecrated phrase both Gorbachev and the Wise Men employ.
. . .
"Those early policies also reflected that blithe and
trusting acceptance by the Wise Men of basic Leninist thinking.
. . as they took the field with the leader who had been judged.
. . most likely to succeed in fulfilling Lenin's ultimate dream
of Soviet messianism. . . ."[12]
That messianic leader was Gorbachev. His blueprint for revolution
came, not from Lenin, but from Antonio Gramsci. This Italian
Communist had aroused Stalins's wrath by suggesting that Lenin's
revolutionary plan wouldn't work: the "oppressed" proletariat
in Christian nations could not be incited to violence against
the bourgoise. After all, in America the two groups prayed together.
So Gramsci wrote a new blueprint for world revolution. Before
long, his plan for Communist infiltration of the media, university,
church, and government was changing the leadership, beliefs,
values, and attitudes of our nation. The primary assault was
on biblical absolutes and Christianity, which must be crushed
as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise
and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:
"By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy
in the West was weak and negligible. . . . Gramsci's master strategy
was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall
an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West
of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity's
transcendent God."
[13]
Whether we agree with Martin's conclusion or not, the process
he describes matches history. George Shultz had helped pave the
way. The merger of US and USSR education strategies laid the
foundations for the new program for training human resources
and monitoring compliance. To bring everyone into the web, they
linked political correctness to success through the national-international
workforce development program signed into law by Clinton in 1998.
When fully implemented, only those who demonstrate conformity
to the new standards for attitudes, values and group thinking
would be rewarded with work and college.[14]
THE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
Apparently, Governor George W. Bush, the frontrunner among
Republican presidential candidates, approves of this system.
His education record in Texas shows his support.
[15]
No wonder, since his father adopted the six goals of UNESCO's
world education system and made them the center piece of America
2000, the Republican version of Clinton's Goals 2000. You read
part of this 1991 announcement earlier, but it's worth repeating.
If the media had warned us, we might have awakened to the current
revolution:
"Nations that stick to stale old notions and ideologies
will falter and fail. So I'm here today to say, America will
move forward.... New schools for a new world.... Re-invent--literally
start from scratch and reinvent the America school.... Our challenge
amounts to nothing less than a revolution in American education."
[16]
President Bush was referring to a paradigm shift in education
that would produce a corresponding shift in our culture. In this
context, a paradigm is a cultural model or mental framework that
determines how people understand and perceive reality. A paradigm
shift means cultural transformation: a totally new way of thinking
and seeing. In the new paradigm, the old absolutes based on the
Bible and the Constitution must be reinterpreted or discarded.
So when Bush spoke of "old notions and ideologies"
and a "revolution in American education", he had already
prepared his plan for changing the minds of America. The management
system had been designed by UNESCO, and the psycho-social strategies
for altering our children's beliefs and values had been promoted
by UNESCO but imported from the Soviet Union.
In other words, everything that had made American education
the envy of the world was now obsolete. In the ashes of the old
ways would arise the UN plan for global education, tested in
the Soviet Union, and designed to mold compliant servers for
the 21st Century "sustainable communities."
[17]
THE PARADIGM SHIFT: Total Transformation
|
OLD
PARADIGM |
NEW PARADIGM |
|
Beliefs |
Based on Bible |
Blend of earth-centered religions |
|
Culture |
Western individualism |
Global solidarity |
|
Values |
Based on Bible |
Based on human idealism |
|
Morals |
Moral boundaries |
Sensual freedom |
|
Rights |
Personal freedom |
Social controls |
|
Economy |
Free enterprise |
Socialist collective |
|
Government |
By the people |
By those who control
the masses |
The masses would be controlled through the Hegelian dialectic
(consensus) process [18] by globalist leaders
who would view the world through the new filter of globalism.
Polls, propaganda, simple slogans, and continual conflicts would
be essential to its success. In fact, the greater the perceived
crisis, the faster the leader can assume the coveted political
powers that true freedom forbids. President Clinton has already
mastered these totalitarian strategies, as Gorbachev suggested
in a 1993 editorial:
"Bill Clinton will be a great president if he can make
America the creator of a new world order based on consensus."[19]
Shultz's ties to Gorbachev link him to a network of leaders
determined to unite the world under a socialist banner.[20] To them, national sovereignty, the U.S.
Constitution, Biblical absolutes, and parental rights are offensive
obstacles [21] that hinder progress. They
use the word "democracy" as if it means freedom, but their policies
point to a world where,
as in Communist countries, only the compliant are free to express
their opinions.[22] In this context, expedient
lies are more valid than truth, and a human life has no value
apart from its place in a political agenda.
[See
Molding
Human Resources for the Global Workforce]
GOD'S PERSPECTIVE
Long ago, the people who followed Jesus misunderstood His
message and sought to crown Him king. But Jesus didn't come to
free His people from their Roman rulers. He came to save us from
bondage to sin, fill us with His life, and enable us to see reality
from His perspective.
From His high vantage point, the
world's threats and conflicts look
far less formidable. Yes, we are moving toward world governance.
Yes, hostility toward God, His Word and His uncompromising people is rising
fast. But when
we trust and seek His guidance, He will surely guide each one of us through the battles ahead. When we follow Him, He will
enable us to walk in His triumph. (2 Cor. 2:14)
The author of Psalm 2 saw the earthly conflict from God's
perspective. His words are as relevant now as ever:
"Why do the nations rage,
And the people plot a vain thing?
The kings of the earth set themselves,
And the rulers take counsel together,
Against the LORD and against His Anointed,
saying, 'Let us break Their bonds in pieces
And cast away Their cords from us.'
He who sits in the heavens shall laugh;
The LORD shall hold them in derision.
Then He shall speak to them in His wrath,
And distress them in His deep displeasure:
'Yet I have set My King on My holy hill of Zion.' . . .
Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him."
Endnotes:
3. Corinne McLaughlin and Gordon Davidson, Spiritual Politics
(New York: Ballantine Books, 1994),147.
4. Stated during a talk at a 1995 mini-UN Conference in San
Francisco titled Celebrating the Spirit, which I attended as
a reporter.
5. McLaughlin, 147-148.
6. Maurice Strong was the executive director of the UN Environmental
Programme, founder of Planetary Citizens, director of the World
Future Society, founder and co-chair of the World Economic Forum,
member of the Club of Rome, trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation
and Aspen Institute, and member of the UN Commission on Global
Governance. He currently heads the Earth Council, which works
with the UN to implement an Earth Charter -- a global code of
conduct based on earth-centered spirituality and globalist values.
7. From Sam Keen's summary of the Roundtable discussions on
"The Global Crisis of Spirit and the Search for Meaning"
at the State of the World Forum, San Francisco, September 27
to October 1, 1995.
9. Shultz replaced Alexander Haig as secretary of state in
July 1982, after Haig's forced resignation during Reagan's first
term. He had served as secretary of labor and secretary of the
treasury in Nixon's administration.
10. David Hamburg later became a participant in Gorbachev's
State of the World Forum.
12. Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood (New York,
Touchstone, 1990), 390-393.
13. Ibid., 398-399.
16. Former President George Bush announcing America 2000,
White House, April 18, 1991. America 2000: An Education Strategy
(Washington: The
17. U.S. Department of Education, 1991), 50, 51, 55.
20. Mikhail Gorbachev, "New World Order: Consensus,"
The Cape Cod Times, January 28, 1993.
No comments:
Post a Comment